Kamma Seshi Reddy @ Prathakota Kamma Seshi Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/1091/2026 · 2026-01-28
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14543 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14543 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010011232026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1091/2026 Between:
1. KAMMA SESHI REDDY @ PRATHAKOTA KAMMA SESHI REDDY, S/O LATE NAGI REDDY, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO. 8/129, KOTA STREET, KONAKANDLA, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522238
2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE WAKF BOARD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 4TH FLOOR, IMDAD GHAR COMPLEX, KALESWARA RAO MARKET, VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT.- 520001
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KUMOOL, KUMOOL DISTRICT, -518002
4. THE TAHSILDAR, KUMOOL RURLA MANDAL, KUMOOL DISTRICT.- 518002
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or
2
direction, declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering petitioner's Online application No. TTAO12500129391 dated 16-04-2025 for deletion of his Patta land Ac.0.64 Cts in Sy.No. 399/4 of Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District, from the list of prohibited properties published under Section 22A (1) (c) of Registration Act, 1908, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and for consequential direction to the respondent No.2 to delete petitioner's Patta land Ac.0.64 Cts in Sy.No. 399/4 of Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District, from the list of prohibited properties forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to delete our Patta landAc.0.64 Cts in Sy.No. 399/4 of Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District, from the list of prohibited properties, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.1091 OF 2026
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ,
Order or direction declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering petitioner's Online application No.TTA012500129391 dated 16-04-2025 for deletion of his Patta land Ac.0.64 Cts in Sy.No.399/4 of Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District, from the list of prohibited properties published under Section 22A(1)(c) of Registration Act, 1908, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and for consequential direction to the respondent No.2 to delete petitioner's Patta land Ac.0.64 Cts in Sy.No.399/4 of Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District, from the list of prohibited properties forthwith and to pass such other order or orders…”
2. The present writ petition is filed challenging the action of the 2nd respondent in not disposing of the petitioner’s online application, vide application No.TTA012500129391 dated 16.04.2025, which was filed seeking deletion of petitioner’s patta land admeasuring Ac.0.64 cents in Sy.No.399/4 of Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District, from the list of prohibited properties published under Section 22A(1)(c) of Registration Act,
1908.
3. Heard Sri D.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2.
4
4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 has not significantly opposed for disposal of the writ petition. However, requested to grant reasonable time for disposal of the petitioner’s online application.
5. Acceding to the request made by the learned Standing Counsel, and as the prayer is innocuous, the present Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner’s online application dated 16.04.2025, after affording an opportunity of hearing, and communicate the decision to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 29.01.2026
KBN
5
60 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1091 of 2026
Date: 29.01.2026
KBN