- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20052 WP No. 11111 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 11111 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIANJINAPPA S/O LATE NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT BILESHIVALE VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU -560 077 2. SMT. LAVANYA. B. M D/O MUNIANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT BILESHIVALE VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU -560 077 3. SMT. NANDAKUMARI.B.M D/O MUNIANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT BILESHIVALE VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU -560 077 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARASIMHA MURTHY L., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20052 WP No. 11111 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPORTMENT MS BUILDING DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR BEEDI BANGALORE 560001 2. THE TAHASILDAR, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-560 036 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION ISSUE TO THE RESPONDENT, NO 2 CONSIDER THE OBJECTION/REPRESENTATION DATED 26.03.2026 MADE BY THE PETITIONER NO. 1 AS PER ANNEXURE-E., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20052 WP No. 11111 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for both the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that at Annexure - B is the RTC in respect of Survey No.123/8 which reflects the name of the petitioners. The second respondent - Tahsildar has issued the impugned notice at Annexure - D proposing to change the Khata / revenue entries in terms of the registered deed of exchange dated 13.03.2026. Learned counsel submits that the deed of exchange is not executed by the petitioners. Further, the schedule in the deed of exchange also does not reflect the Survey No.123/8 and therefore, the petitioners have given a representation at Annexure-E dated 26.03.2026 to the respondent - Tahsildar to take note of the said discrepancy and have requested the Tahsildar to make the necessary corrections in the notice. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20052 WP No. 11111 of 2026 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that if such a representation is given by the petitioners, the second respondent - Tahsildar is duty bound to consider the same and take note of the mistake found in the notice issued by the Tahsildar. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a specific direction to the second respondent - Tahsildar, Bengaluru (East) Taluk to consider the representation given by the petitioners, take note of the discrepancies in the survey number and ensure that no changes are made in the revenue entries in respect of Survey No.123/8 which is not the subject matter of the deed of exchange 5. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28