Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14541 (JHR)

CHANDRA PRAKASH TIWARY And ORS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS

WPC/6139/2011 · 2026-01-28

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2199 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6139 of 2011 1. Chandra Prakash Tiwary son of Raj Narayan Tiwary, resident of Village- Jigna Tiwari Tola, Post Office & Police Station- Rivilganj, District Chapra (Saran), Bihar 2. Gautam Kumar Singh son of Sri Biran Singh, resident of Village- Tetariya, Post Office- Ichak, Police Station- Ichak, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 3. Suresh Mahto son of Sri Mangar Mahto, resident of Village- Nayparam, Post Office- Tandwa, Police Station- Tandwa, District-Chatra ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General & Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Inspector General of Police (Modernization & Provision), Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, Post Office-G.P.O., Police Station- Kotwali, District- Ranchi 5. The Superintendent of Police-cum-Chairman, Selection Board (Driver Constable), Khunti, Post Office-Khunti, Police Station- Khunti District- Khunti ... … Respondent(s) With W.P.(S) No. 2534 of 2011 1. Santosh Kumar son of Sri Bhuwaneshwar Pandey, resident of Qr. No. DT-1721, At Dhurwa, Post Office-Dhurwa, Police Station-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 2. Prem Kumar son of Sri Sadhu Saran Ram, resident of P.H.E.D. Colony, At-Dhurwa, Post Office- Dhurwa, Police Station-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 3. Pramod Kumar son of Sri Chandeshwar Rai, resident of DT-504, At- Dhurwa, Post Office- Dhurwa, Police Station- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 4. Kuldeep Kumar son of Sri Vidya Sagar Prasad, resident of DT-41, At- Dhurwa, Post Office- Dhurwa, Police Station- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 5. Shiv Shankar Singh son of Sri Sudama Singh, resident of Qr. No. A/42, CTI Colony, At-Dhurwa, Post Office-Dhurwa, Police Station-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General & Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi 2026:JHHC:2199 2 3. The Inspector General of Police (Modernization & Provision), Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, Post Office-G.P.O., Police Station- Kotwali, District- Ranchi 5. The Superintendent of Police-cum-Chairman, Selection Board (Driver Constable), Khunti, Post Office- Khunti, Police Station- Khunti, District- Khunti ... … Respondent(s) With W.P.(S) No. 5174 of 2011 1. Binod Kumar son of late Ramdhyan Roy, resident of Village- Nagra Toli, Ranchi, Post Office & Police Station-Lalpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Baleshwar Kumar Mahto son of Sri Somnath Mahto, resident of Village-Parbaridih, Post Office-Baridih, Police Station- Ormanjhi, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. Suresh Lama son of Sher Bahadur Lama, resident of JAP-1, Masjid Lane, Doranda, Post Office & Police Station- Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. Rajesh Kumar son of Supeni Choudhary, resident of Village- New Lake Avenue, Kanke Road, Post Office-Jawahar Nagar, Police Station- Gonda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General & Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Inspector General of Police (Modernization & Provision), Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, Post Office- G.P.O., Police Station- Kotwali, District-Ranchi 5. The Superintendent of Police-cum-Chairman, Selection Board (Driver Constable), Khunti, Post Office-Khunti, Police Station-Khunti, District- Khunti ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birendra Burman, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, AC to GP-II -------- Order No. 5 /Dated: 28th January 2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners, for want of instruction, 2026:JHHC:2199 3 does not want to press these writ applications, however, he prays that a liberty may be given to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum, if so advised. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not raise objection. 3. Accordingly, all these writ applications are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners as prayed for. 4. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 28th January 2026 Amit Uploaded on 03/02/2026