HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12056 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Heard Mr. Amar Singh Yadav, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned AGA representing State/respondents 1 and 2. 2. Perused the record. 3. On the matter being taken up, learned AGA representing State/respondents 1 and 2 submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of concerned case crime number has forwarded the charge sheet/police report in terms of Section 173 (2) CrPC. Therefore, in all probability, cognizance upon same must have been taken by the concerned Jurisdictional Magistrate/Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC. 4. In view of above, we are of the considered opinion that by efflux of time, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 5. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 6. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. October 8, 2026 YK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh Yadav, Vinod Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Chandan Kumar Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- YASHWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad