IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 425/2026 Decided on: 07.07.2026 Kamer Singh ...…Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …….Respondents …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. S.S. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record a copy of office order dated 06.07.2026, and, on that basis, submits that the judgment in question stands complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the office order filed by the respondents, this contempt petition may be closed, however, liberty be reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievance(s), if any, including against the consideration order passed by the respondents. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3. Granting such permission, this contempt petition is closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 07th July, 2026 rohit