2026:JHHC:4009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.203 of 2025 ----- Sikshaketar Karamchari, Sangh, Birsa Agricultural University, Kanke, Ranchi, having Registration No. F17-212(A)/2013/BAU(VC)- Part II259/Kanke, Dated-27-4-2016 through its General Secretary, namely Meghnath Mahto, aged about, 59 Years, son of Late Jaggu Mahto, R/o- Village-Kadma, P.O.-Kanke, P.S.-Kanke, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. Sunil Chandra Dubey, Fathers name not known to the petitioner, The Vice-Chancellor, Birsa agricultural university, Kanke, PO & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Ejaz Anwar, Fathers name not known to the petitioner, The Director administration, Birsa agricultural university, Kanke, PO & P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The State of Jharkhand 4. Alka Tiwari, Fathers name not known to the petitioner, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, H.E.C Campus, PO- Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Aboo Backer, Fathers name not known to the petitioner, The Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, and Cooperative Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, H.E.C Campus, PO- Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6.Prashant Kumar, Fathers name not known to the petitioner, The Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, H.E.C Campus, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagannathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate Mr. M. K. Sinha, Advocate For the OP : Mr. Abdul Allam, Sr. Advocate Ms. Sushmita Kumari, Advocate Mr. Faisal Allam, Advocate Ms. Asfia Sultana, Advocate …...... 06 /13.02.2026: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. The matter relates to grant of ACP/MACP. The order was passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court on 17.10.2014 in WP(S) No. 5581 of 2024 to take a decision in this regard. 3. The respondents have taken a decision that ACP/MACP is not payable as because there is no scheme of ACP/MACP with the Birsa Agricultural University. 2026:JHHC:4009 2 4. Thus, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. 5. This contempt application is dropped. 6. If the petitioner wants some benefit proper application should be filed by them, if permissible. 7. Pending I.A.s, if any, stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 13.02.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 16.02.2026