Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14520 (PNJ)

STATE OF HARYANA v. RAJO @ RAJWANTI & ORS.

RFA/4612/2010 · 2026-01-14

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-461 136 (18) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA State of Haryana Smt. Rajo CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) and others Vs. State of Haryana and anr. even date. 14.01.2026 sanjay 4612-2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA Date of Decision: 14.01.2026 State of Haryana Versus Smt. Rajo @ Rajwanti and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Present: Mr.Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate for the appellants/landowners -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-2968 and others Vs. State of Haryana and anr. even date. 14.01.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-4612-2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.01.2026 …….Appellant Versus ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate /landowners. 2968-2010, titled as Ram Mehar and others Vs. State of Haryana and anr., decided vide order of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Ram Mehar , decided vide order of (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.20 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document