SHUBHAM DUBEY @ SHUBHAM KUMAR DUBEY v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1623/2026 · 2026-03-12
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14520 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14520 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6832
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1623 of 2026
--------- Shubham Dubey @ Shubham Kumar Dubey, aged about 33 years, S/o Ram Chandra Dubey, resident of Bermo Road, Near Shiv Mandir, Jainamore Mishra Site, Village- Bandhdih, P.O.-Jaina, P.S.-Bermo, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand; ....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner
: M/s. Pankaj Verma, Vikesh Kumar,
Sanket Kumar, Trishna Sagar, Advocates For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-12.03.2026
1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 303 (2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 23.12.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) March 12, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 16.03.2026