OMPRAKASH KASHYAP S/O LATE SHRI DHANNALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/985/2026 · 2026-04-08
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1452 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1452 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14505] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 985/2026 Omprakash Kashyap S/o Late Shri Dhannalal, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Chavani, Ramchandrapura, Police Station Gumanpura, Kota City At Present At Madhu Gochar Ka Makaan No. B-124, Swaraj Apna Ghar Housing Society Manpura, Police Station Borkheda, Kota, District Kota (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 08/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 214/2024 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 & 120B of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 420 & 406 BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has been filed; He further submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; petitioner is behind the bars since 08.12.2025; trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars, and, therefore, prays that
[2026:RJ-JP:14505] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-985/2026] the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that two other criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since 08.12.2025; the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Omprakash Kashyap S/o Late Shri Dhannalal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application
[2026:RJ-JP:14505] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-985/2026] against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J EKTA/13