Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14518 (JHR)

MD TABREJ ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./189/2026 · 2026-03-12

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6679 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 189 of 2026 --------- Md. Tabrej Alam, aged about 32 years, S/o Md. Salim Ansari, R/o village-Chirudih, P.O.-Morbhanga, P.S.-Dumka (M), District-Dumka. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Onkar Nath Tewary, Shamaiel Raza, Kranti Kirti, Advocates For the Opp. Party : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. --------- 04/Dated:-12.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 69 of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner and the informant were having love affair and the entire relationship was consensual and also the informant was well aware of the fact that the petitioner is a married man having a wife and two children and she is also a married lady. He further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 01.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and the petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Dumka in connection with Dumka (Town) P.S. Case No. 63/2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.112/2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) March 12, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 16.03.2026