Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14518 (ALL)

TINNU YADAV @ AVINASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/10285/2026 · 2026-10-08

Vivek Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10285 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No 73 of 2026, under Sections 317(2) BNS, Police Station Iliya, District Chandauli, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehendhis arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. At the very outset, the learned A.G.A. has raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the instant application by submitting that the applicant does not apprehend their arrest as the offences that have been alleged against the applicant does not entail in the event of a conviction, a punishment of more than seven years. He further contends that appropriate protection has been provided in the BNSS itself in the form of Section 35(3) BNSS and the judgments passed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Anr., 2024 (8) SCC 273 and Mohd. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand and anr., (2023) 8 SCC 632 also safeguard the interest of the applicant. 4. Upon being confronted with the objection raised by the learned A.G.A., the learned counsel for the applicant failed to satisfactorily meet the same. 5. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to dispose of the present application with a direction to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Vivek Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tinnu Yadav @ Avinash Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the Investigating Officer to strictly comply with the directions issued by the Supreme court in Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Mohd. Asfak Alam (supra) while conducting the investigation in the above-mentioned case. 6. The application stands disposed of. October 9, 2026 A.P. Pandey NABAIL No. 10285 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad