Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14517 (RAJ)

MOHIT VERMA S/O RAJENDRA VERMA v. RINKU DHABAI W/O JITENDRA DHABAI

CFA/1790/2025 · 2026-08-20

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:33396] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1790/2025 CNR: RJHC020987252025 | URN: CFA / 2947U / 2025 1 Mohit Verma S/o Rajendra Verma, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Plot No. C-37, Indrapuri Colony, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2 Raveena Verma W/o Jitendra Bandawal D/o Rajendra Verma, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of F-12, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Bais Godam, Jaipur. ----Appellants Versus 1 Rinku Dhabai W/o Jitendra Dhabai, Aged Adult, Resident- Plot Number B-2, Janta Colony, Ghatgate, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2 Rajendra Verma S/o Late Shri Narayan Verma, Aged Adult, Resident Of C-37, Indrapuri Colony, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3 Hanuman Verma S/o Late Shri Narayan Verma, Aged Adult, Resident Of-19, Shiva Colony, Imliwala Fatak, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4 Up Panjiyak, Adhikari Amer Tehsil Bhawan Amer District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Jinal Gehalot with Ms. Surbhi Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/08/2026 In IA No.1/2026: 1. Matter has come up on application (IA No.1/2026) filed by the applicants/appellants, seeking withdrawal of the present civil first appeal. [2026:RJ-JP:33396] (2 of 2) [CFA-1790/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the pendency of the present civil first appeal, the parties have settled the pending dispute in the pious spirit of Lok Adalat. 3. In view of the above, and upon instructions from her clients, learned counsel for the appellants does not wish to pursue the present first appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the same. She further prays that the Court fees so paid by the appellants may kindly be refunded back to the appellants. 4. Heard. 5. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellants, the present civil first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the appellants are entitled for the refund of the Court fees of Rs.77,346/- in terms of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.1, therefore, the Registry is directed to prepare a certificate regarding the refund of the Court fees of Rs.77,346/- in favour of the appellants. 7. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the present first appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 8. All other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J 68/Seema 1 (2021) 3 SCC 560