Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14514 (RAJ)

TASLIM S/O SAHID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8897/2026 · 2026-08-31

Ravi Chirania

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:34797] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8897/2026 CNR: RJHC020549082026 | URN: CRLMB / 16321U / 2026 Taslim S/o Sahid, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Jotripipal, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10660/2026 CNR: RJHC020622982026 | URN: CRLMB / 19775U / 2026 1 . Abbas S/o Tahir, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Khandiyawas, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. Currently Confined At Central Jail, Deeg. 2 . Asjad S/o Aasmohammad, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Khandiyawas, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. Currently Confined At Central Jail, Deeg. ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 31/08/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed by the petitioners, who were arrested in connection with FIR No.81/2026 dated 15.05.2026 in which Police after conducting investigation [2026:RJ-JP:34797] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-8897/2026] has filed the charge-sheet against them on 12.08.2026 at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of I.T. Act, 2000. 2. Learned counsel submitted that the complaints against the petitioners on ‘1930’ portal are of petty nature. Learned counsel submitted that after detailed investigation, Police have filed the charge-sheet against them on 12.08.2026. In view of above, they pray that the petitioners herein may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail applications and submits that there are certain complaints against the petitioners on ‘1930’ portal involving a total amount approx. of Rs.77,000/-. 4. After considering the nature of allegations as reported in the FIR, long incarceration of the petitioner, the fact that the charge- sheet has already been filed and without commenting upon merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are hereby allowed and it is directed that accused- petitioners- namely 1. Taslim S/o Sahid 2. Abbas S/o Tahir 3.Asjad S/o Aasmohammad shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- 1. Each of the accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two [2026:RJ-JP:34797] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-8897/2026] sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused-petitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused- petitioners have in their name. (ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction, statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO. 3. The accused-petitioners shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioners shall surrender their passport, if they have, before the learned trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused- petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the learned trial Court. 5. The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or [2026:RJ-JP:34797] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-8897/2026] any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO. 6. The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order. 7. The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners. 8. The accused-petitioners shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer. 9. The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. 10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. 11. The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation. [2026:RJ-JP:34797] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-8897/2026] 12. The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. 6. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J GAURAV SHARMA/46-47