Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14511 (AP)

Vavilapalli Lakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/1116/2026 · 2026-03-09

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010009642026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 1116/2026 Between: 1. VAVILAPALLI LAKSHMI,, W/O. APPALA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.DR.NO.52-1-9/7, GUNDALA HARAJANAWADA, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), MACHAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. CHANDAKA MAHA LAKSHMI,, W/O. APPALA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. PARAJAPADU VILLAGE, JIYYAMMAVALASA MANDAL, PALAKONDA DIVISION, PARVATIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PARVATIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT - 535501 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, MANYAM DISTRICT - 535501 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKONDA, PARVATIPURAM, MANYAM DISTRICT. - 535501 5. THE TAHSILDAR, JIYYAMMAVALASA MANDAL, PARVATIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT.- 535501 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 BKM,J W.P.No.1116 of 2026 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. UDAY KUMAR VAMPUGADAVALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.1116 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 3rd respondent in not considering the recommendation of the Tahsildar in R.C.No.265/2024/S.A., dated 02.01.2025 and the recommendation of the Sub-Collector in R.C.No.139/2025/KRCC, dated 03.03.2025 signed on 05.03.2025 to log open the web land in respect of the property admeasuring Ac.0.06cts in Sy.No.148-5, Ac.0.24cts in Sy.No.148-9, Ac.0.10cts in Sy.No.149-10, Ac.0.05cts in Sy.No.150-2, Ac.0.11cts in Sy.No.150-4, Ac.0.03cts in Sy.No.150-7 and Ac.0.16cts in Sy.No.152-9 totaling to an extent of Ac.0.75cts in respect of the 1st petitioner and the extents of Ac.0.05cts in Sy.No.148-5, Ac.0.24cts in Sy.No.149-9, Ac.0.11cts in Sy.No.149-10, Ac.0.04cts in Sy.No.150-2, Ac.0.11cts in Sy.No.150-4, Ac.0.03cts in Sy.No.150-7 and an extent of Ac.0.16cts in Sy.No.152-9 totaling the extent of Ac.0.74cts in respect of the 2nd petitioner lands of Parijapadu Village, Jiyyammavalasa Mandal, Parvatipuram Manyam District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 2nd respondent dated 10.03.2026 submits that since the writ petitioner not responded to the notice issued by the 5th respondent dated 18.11.2025 to submit the required information i.e., partition deed or supporting documents etc., no action has been taken in the matter. 4 BKM,J W.P.No.1116 of 2026 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, as the petitioners relied upon the recommendations of the Tahsildar in R.C.No.265/2024/S.A., dated 02.01.2025 and the Sub-Collector in R.C.No.139/2025/KRCC, dated 03.03.2025 signed on 05.03.2025 and for the purpose of taking action by the 3rd respondent, the petitioners shall respond to the notice of the 5th respondent dated 18.11.2025 by submitting the required documents i.e., partition deed or supporting documents for their claim within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On submission of the said documents before the 5th respondent, the respondent Nos.3 to 5 shall consider the claim of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three (03) months thereafter. The said written instructions of the 2nd respondent dated 10.03.2026 shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 10.03.2026 PGT