ROJAMAT ANSARI ALIAS MD ROJAMAT ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1738/2026 · 2026-03-12
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14508 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14508 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6632
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1738 of 2026
-------- Rojamat Ansari @ Md. Rojamat Ansari, aged about 27 years, son of Late Samruddin @ Md. Samruddin Ansari, resident of Raza Colony, P.O. & P.S.-Gumla, District-Gumla
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party -----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-------- For the Petitioner : Md. Abdul Wahab, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P. --------
Order No. 02/ Dated: 12th March, 2026
Heard Md. Abdul Wahab, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Spl. P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner has moved for grant of bail in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No.38 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 17(b), 21(b) & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985, pending before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Gumla.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery has been inflicted from the possession of the petitioner rather except one mobile phone. The seizure list regarding recovery of brown sugar of 85 grams has been attributed against co-accused Shiva Kumar Sahu. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent of any offence and he is in custody since 02.12.2025. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial of the case and abide by all terms and conditions which may be imposed. Hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail.
4. On the other hand, learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that there is joint seizure list in which the name of petitioner has also been mentioned and all the accused persons including the present petitioner were travelling in the
2026:JHHC:6632
2
same vehicle and the recovery of brown sugar was recovered from co- accused Shiva Kumar Sahu, therefore, the petitioner does not deserve bail.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the fact that except mobile phone, nothing incriminating article, constituting the offence under N.D.P.S. Act, has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, I am inclined to release the above- named petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner named above, is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Session Judge, Gumla, in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No.38 of 2025.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 12.03.2026 Arpit Uploaded on 13/03/2026