Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14508 (DEL)

VANDANA AGGARWAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/11514/2026 · 2026-08-12

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 11514/2026 $~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010370612026 + W.P.(C) 11514/2026 & CM APPL. 53320/2026 VANDANA AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nipun Dixit, Mr. Ujjaval Pandey and Mr. Ayush Gangawar, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Bhuvneshwar Tyagi, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 12.08.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:55:21 W.P.(C) 11514/2026 2. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner is the co-owner of the property bearing No. 4072. Kucha Dilwali Singh, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi – 11006 (‘subject property’). It is further stated that a civil suit instituted by the petitioner for partition of the subject property is pending before the District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the subject property is a very old construction and it may collapse anytime. Therefore, a direction is sought that officials of MCD do a structural survey of the subject property and take appropriate action in accordance with law. 4. Counsel appears on advance notice on behalf of the private respondent no.3 and submits that in the suit filed by the petitioner before the District Court, parties have been directed to maintain status quo. He further submits that the private respondent no.3 has filed an application for carrying out repairs in the subject property. However, the same has been opposed by This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:55:21 W.P.(C) 11514/2026 the petitioner. 5. Mr. Akhil Mittal, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent- MCD on advance notice submits that the subject property has been inspected by officials of MCD yesterday and in their opinion, the subject property is not in a dangerous condition. 6. It is an admitted position that the subject property is under the possession and control of the private respondent no.3. 7. To be noted, as per the memo of parties as well as the identity proof of the petitioner filed with the petition, the petitioner has given her address as Building No. 39, Third Floor, Tyagi Chowk, Shakarpur, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi – 110092. 8. Considering the aforesaid, this Court is of the opinion that the present writ petition has been filed for oblique motives. Hence, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. 9. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 10. Pending application stands disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J AUGUST 12, 2026 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:55:21