APHC010010382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 548/2025 Between: 1. GARIKAPATI SHANKAR BABU,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. D. N0.3-25-A, ALAVALAPADU VILLAGE, J. PANGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM NOW BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM NOW BAPATLA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA DIVISION, PRAKASAM NOW BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, J. PANGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM NOW BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RENINGAVARAM POLICE STATION, J. PANGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM NOW BAPATIA DISTRICT. 6. ADDANKI SINGARACHARYULU, S/O. A. THATHACHARUYULU, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/O. TAKKELLAPADU VILLAGE, J. PANGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM NOW BAPATIA DISTRICT. 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.548 of 2025 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JAGARLAMUDI ANJANEE PRIYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KARTHEEK SONTEM 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.548 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in not resolving the issue of Bandi Daari passing through from Sy.Nos.92 to 97 situated at T. Thakkellapadu Village, J. Panguluru Mandal, Prakasam Now Bapatla District on representation dated 20.12.2024 submitted to the 4th respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the Village map at Page No.63 of the material papers filed along with the writ petition. 4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent submits that the following are the particulars of land in Sy.No.92 to 97 of T. Thakkellapadu Village. Sy.No. Extent Ac. Classification 92 1.58 Kunta (existing road on ground as shown in the map) 93-1 2.32 Patta Land 93-2 1.83 Patta Land 94-1 3.11 Patta Land 94-2 1.09 Patta Land 94-3 1.11 Patta Land 95-1 1.26 Patta Land 95-2 2.32 Patta Land 95-3 3.01 Patta Land 96 5.88 Patta Land 97-1 2.03 Patta Land 97-2 0.52 Canal 97-3 4.50 Patta Land 97-4 1.85 Patta Land 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.548 of 2025 There is no way in the above mentioned survey numbers as claimed by the petitioner. The way mentioned in the document is not existing on the ground. The 6th respondent is having land in Sy.No.96 and 97/3 of T. Thakkellapadu Village as shown below: Sy.No. Extent 96 5.88 97-3 4.50 _____ 10.38 This land is a patta land and there is no way through these lands as claimed by the petitioner. The 6th respondent erected fencing around his patta land. But he has not constructed any wall on Bandi Dari claimed by the petitioner. The petitioner has to go to his patta lands, through the bunds of the lands from Donka. There is no Kali bata in Sy.Nos.96 and 97 as claimed by the petitioner. 5. The learned counsel for the 6th respondent also adopts the contention of the official respondents. 6. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 6th respondent instituted O.S.No.178 of 2020 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Addanki against the petitioner and others showing them as defendants in respect of Sy.Nos.97/3, 96 and 96 as detailed in the Plaint Schedule to an extent of Ac.10.38 cents in total. 5 HBKM,J W.P.No.548 of 2025 7. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, this Court cannot go into the factual aspects of the dispute with regard to the claim of the petitioner as the Civil Suit is also pending before the appropriate Court, no relief can be granted in this writ petition. However, the parties are permitted to work out their remedies in a Competent Civil Court. 8. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 11.02.2026 PGT