B.V.Ramana, S/o. Venkata Ramanappa v. The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep. by its Managing Director
WP/13702/2016 · 2026-02-05
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14504 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14504 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010008202016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13702/2016 Between:
1. B.V.RAMANA, S/O. VENKATA RAMANAPPA,, R/O. 28-14-28/11/1, RAM NAGAR COLONY, SAI RAM STREET, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE A P S R T C REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD
2. THE A P S R T C REP BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, TIRUPATHI REGION, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. THE A P S R T C REP BY ITS DEPOT MANAGER, CHITTOOR -I DEPOT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
2 W.P.No.13702 of 2016
The Court made the following ORDER:
On 21.03.2025, this Court passed the following order:
“No representation for the petitioner. Post on 28.03.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’ in the Daily List-1.”
2. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent – Corporation is in attendance.
4. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Date:06.02.2026 Dvs
3 W.P.No.13702 of 2016
190
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.13702 of 2016
Date: 06.02.2026
Dvs