Jhunni Ray @ Jhimi Ray @ Zimilal Ray v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./31993/2026 · 2026-05-07
Anshuman
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14502 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14502 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31993 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Jhunni Ray @ Jhimi Ray @ Zimilal Ray Son of Late Brahm Ray Resident Of Village -Jurawanpur, Ps- Bidupur, Dist -Vaishali At Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sachin Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 07-05-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.269 of 2024 lodged on 27.05.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 325, 354, 452, 504, 150, 114 and 506 of the IPC read with section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against 18 named accused persons including the present petitioner with allegation against the petitioner that he was keeping lathi in his hand. The cause of dispute as alleged in the FIR is due to land which was in possession of the informant on which pillar was built by the informant. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel also submits that there is land dispute between the parties. He
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31993 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 further submits that both are resident of same village and due to old land dispute, scuffling took place between the parties and injury has been caused to both sides. 5. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean and aged about 52 years. He further submits that the only role of present petitioner is that he had kept lathi in his hand. 6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he had kept lathi in his hand and there is no any act and overt act against him. 7.
As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of J.M.-1st Class -cum-Addl. Munsif, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.269 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS,
2023. Prakashmani/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U T