Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14500 (BOM)

SAMBHAJI VINAYAK JAGTAP v. SANTOSH SUBHASH KHANDAGALE

IA/3259/2026 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/2 6 IA-3259-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3259 OF 2026 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 38 OF 2019 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1232 OF 2018 Sambhaji Vinayak Jagtap … Applicant/Plaintiff Vs. Santosh Subhash Khandagale & Others … Defendants _______ Mr. Siddharth Joshi i/b Ms. Varsha Bhogle for Applicant/Plaintiff. Mr. Sachin Pawar for Defendant Nos. 3 to 7. _______ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 5 TH OCTOBER, 2026. P.C. 1. This Interim Application seeks to bring on record the legal heirs of one of the legal heirs of the deceased, who has since passed away. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Caveator/Defendant has opposed the Interim Application. He, however, does not wish to file reply affidavit. Sairaj SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Digitally signed by SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Date: 2026.10.06 12:43:09 +0530 2/2 6 IA-3259-2026.DOC 3. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and having noted the formal nature of the amendment, in my view, the same would have to be allowed and is accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. Interim Application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) Sairaj