City Union Bank Limited, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/8442/2026 · 2026-05-03
Subhendu Samanta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1450 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1450 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010162542026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 8442/2026 Between:
1. CITY UNION BANK LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED. OFFICE AT D.NO.149, TSR BIG STREET, KUMBAKONAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT, TAMAILNADU-612001, AND HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT D.NO.8/202, HOSPITAL ROAD, OPP SANGAM THEATRE, MITTA PALEM, GUDUR, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-524101 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, SRINIVASA PRASAD KK S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. CITY UNION BANK LTD, GUDUR
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238
2. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING SUPERVISION, CENTRAL OFFICE (FRAUD WING), II FLOOR, CENTRE 1, WORLD TRADE CENTRE, CUFFE PARADE, COLABA MUMBAI -400 005
3. M/S FASHION INFLUENCE CLOTHING INDIA PVT LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR BUSSAREDDY CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT D.NO.1018,NEW N0.84 RR SRIVARU COMPLEX, II FLOOR 6TH AVENUE ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI-600040 AND BRANCH OFFICE AT 1ST AND 2ND FLOORS, KRB COMPLEX SHIRIDI SAI NAGAR,
2
NEAT APSRTC BUS STAND,GNDUR-524101
4. 5. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID),
AP POLICE HEADQUARTERS, FIRST FLOOR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -522503 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, REGIONAL OFFICE, CID, NEAR NEW BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH-
517501.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in not concluding the investigation even after a lapse of one year three months as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 5th respondent to conclude the investigation within a time frame and take action against the concerned and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant an Interim direction directing to the respondent No.4 and 5 to conclude the investigation with respect to the fraud account of the 3rd respondent borrower within a time frame and take necessary action after completion of the investigation and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M BALANAGA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. SPL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CID
3
The Court made the following Order:
Petitioner is a registered Bank. He report a fraud mentioning return held at said Bank. The matter went up to Reserve Bank of India which also held that it was a fraud return. In pursuance of memo dated 19.05.2025 issued by Deputy Superintendent of Police, CID RO, Tirupati, the Branch Manager of the petitioner has placed all documents as required on 22.05.2025, since then the investigating agency has not taken any proper steps for enquiry, thus, approached this Court seeking necessary relief, so that, police authority will conclude investigation as early as possible. 2. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, has placed a written memo dated 13.03.2026 signed on behalf of the Director of General Police, CID, A.P., Mangalagiri, which contends inter alia that the enquiry has been conducted properly and it was completed, thereafter, the same was placed before the concerned authority on 23.01.2026 for legal opinion, finally on 13.03.2026 order of closer of enquiry was passed. 3.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the written memo, it appears that the petitioner being the complainant is unaware about the enquiry conducted by the police authority in pursuance to the report. The petitioner being aggrieved person is required to be informed about progress/status of every proceeding taken by the investigating agency. Accordingly, the respondent authorities are directed to handover all the documents including the enquiry report and connected material/documents concerned, which were obtained by the police authority in the course of
4
investigation including any opinion, remarks and the report of the officials regarding closer of the investigation to the petitioner, within two weeks from the date of petitioner’s approach to the 5th respondent. 4. On the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date : 04.05.2026 Note : C.C. by two days. (B/o.) SPP
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO.8442 of 2026
Dated 04.05.2026
Note : C.C. by two days. (B/o.) SPP