2026:JHHC:7390 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 911 of 2026 --------- 1. Abu Bakar @ Md. Abubakar Siddique, aged about 35 years, son of Md. Naimuddin @ Md. Nayeemuddin @ Naimuddin; 2. Md. Naimuddin @ Md. Nayeemuddin @ Naimuddin, aged about 65 years, son of late Md. Hasim; 3. Md. Usman Gani @ Md. Usman Ghani, aged about 40 years, son of Md. Naimuddin @ Md. Nayeemuddin @ Naimuddin; All residents of Parsa, P.O. and P.S. Hanwara, District Godda. ....Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Ms. J. Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Ms. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. Mr. Abdul Wahab, Advocate --------- 04/ 18.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 109, 103(1), 352, 351(2) & 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and no specific overt act has been attributed to the present petitioners. Learned counsel further submits that incident had occurred due to land disputes. No incriminating article or any weapon have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. No concrete evident has been brought on record to show the capability of the petitioners in the alleged offence. Learned counsel further submits that Co-accused namely, Md. Umar @ Umar Fahrukh and Md. Rajjak @ Rajjak have been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.03.2026, passed in B.A. No. 2088 of 2026. He further submits that petitioner No.1 is languishing in custody since 2026:JHHC:7390 2 29.10.2025 whereas petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are in custody since 25.10.2025; as such, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the Informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 5. Having regard to the above submission coupled with the fact that co-accused namely, Md. Umar @ Umar Fahrukh and Md. Rajjak @ Rajjak, who are having same and similar allegation then that of petitioner No. 1 and 3, have been granted bail and so far as petitioner No. 2 is concerned the allegation against him of instigation and further the incident took place on account of land dispute and the allegations are general in nature; I am inclined to enlarge these petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Remi Praphul Baa, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda in connection with Hanwara P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioners, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of these petitioners. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 18th March, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 18.03.2026