HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35464 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Saroj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri A.K. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 277 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 338, 340, 336(3), 61(2) BNS and 66D of Information Technology Act, Police Station Tajganj, District Agra, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, taking into consideration the fact that applicant was simply a receptionist in the company and there being no cogent evidence against her regarding the said allegations; that the applicant has no criminal antecedents to her credit and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Bhawna Singh, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to verification of sureties, with the condition that she shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any of the above condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observation herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 6, 2026 Shalini Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ayush Singh, Maheshwari Yadav, Saroj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bhawna Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad