APHC010005862024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] SATURDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 185/2024 Between: 1. B C RAVEENDRA NAIDU, S/O B.CHENGALARAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO. 1-24/5, THAGHAVARRI PALLE, BANGARUPALYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. A.P- 517416 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI A SURYA KUMARI IAS, COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI M CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R.I DIVISION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SRI P PRABHAKAR REDDY, THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, PLG. AND WING, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. SRI SIVA KUMAR, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. GUNTHUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, RC,J C.C No.185 of 2024 2 CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 22.09.2023 made in W.P.No.24244 of 2Q23 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 2. G VENKATA REDDY 3. C SUMON RC,J C.C No.185 of 2024 3 The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 22.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.24244 of 2023. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with by the respondent authorities, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in touch with him, a letter has been addressed. So far, not received any acknowledgment in that regard. 4. As the authorities have complied with the directions of this Court, there is no purpose in keeping the contempt case pending and the contempt case is liable to be closed. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. If the petitioner still feels that the cause in the contempt case survives, he may file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date:31.01.2026 Ksj