- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8548 WP No. 392 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 392 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT SUJATHA K W/O K.R.KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT KEMPASHETTYDODDI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN-562109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVISHA M G.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE GREATER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA, RAMANAGARA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT, B.M.ROAD, RAMANAGARA-562159. 3. THE COMMISSIONER THE GRETER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, RAMANGARA, RAMANAGARA TALUK, B.M.ROAD, RAMANAGARA -562159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPPANNA BELLIYAPPA., AGA FOR R1; SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8548 WP No. 392 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT/ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE R3 AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.04.2025 i.e., ANNX-D AND DISPOSE THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; “(a) Directing the Respondents No.3 authority to consider the representation dated 21.4.2025 i.e., Annexure-D and dispose the same in accordance with law; and (b) Pass such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the request made by the petitioner to the respondent No.3 to get a sale deed registered has not been considered by respondent No.3. 3. On part of the respondents, it is contented that the same is due to the notification which has been issued on 12.03.2025 at Annexure-C. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8548 WP No. 392 of 2026 4. A Co-ordinate bench of this Court has dealt with a similar matter vide its order dated on 18.11.2025 in W.P.No.34197/2025 and has held that such a restriction, even if imposed, the respondents would have to consider the representation and pass necessary orders on the said representation. 5. In that view of the matter, I pass the following: ORDER i) Writ petition is allowed. ii) A mandamus is issued, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2025 at Annexure-D within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE KTY/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48