$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010360452026 + W.P.(CRL) 2366/2026 DIGITAL WEB SOLUTION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH PADUM KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Murari Singh and Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advs. versus STATE(GNCTD) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State. SI Azad Singh Malik, PS: Cyber Police Station. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 07.08.2026 CRL.M.A. 23916/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2366/2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (‘BNSS’) seeking quashing of the alleged undisclosed and uncommunicated direction resulting in the blanked debit- freeze/ restriction of the bank account no. 3134020001071412 and directions for immediate restoration of banking operations or in the alternative confinement of lien to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:45:18 the specific disputed amount of Rs. 1,000/-. 2. It is purported in the present application, that the applicant inadvertently received ₹1,000 via UPI on 08.04.2024, as a bona fide payment for services, completely unaware of any connection to alleged cyber fraud. 3. The applicant contends having a clean record and is willing to cooperate with the Cyber PS (East District, Delhi). Furthermore, the fact that the account appears remotely at the transaction trail, the entire bank account has been subjected to a disproportionate debit freeze. 4. Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, learned ASC, on advance instructions, submits that a complaint was lodged by one Abhay Kumar, who reported the fraud of Rs.4,85,000/- as cheated amount. According to National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (‘NCRP’) money trail, an amount of Rs.1,000/- was credited in the present account. 5. Mr Ansari, therefore, submits that the complaint was closed as the complainant has not pressed his complaint for registration of case. He, therefore, contends that the removal of debit freeze/restriction from the said account has also been directed. The communication dated 06.08.2026 to that effect has been handed over. Copy thereof has also been given to the petitioner’s counsel. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the concerned bank is directed to immediately take action in pursuance to the communication dated 06.08.2026. 7. With these observations, petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J AUGUST 7, 2026/P This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:45:18