Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14491 (KAR)

MS JYOTHI K L v. THE CHIEF MANAGER

WP/27083/2025 · 2026-02-17

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9776 WP No. 27083 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 27083 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MS JYOTHI K L D/O LAKSHMINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF RENUKA YELLAMA STREET, OPP: TO DHANRAJ LAWYER HOUSE, JAYANAGAR, KOLAR-563101. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O AFTAB NASEER HUSSAIN, BERLINERSTRABE, 32, 1ST FLOOR, RATHENOW, BERLIN, STATE FRANKFURT AM MAIN. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAY GOWDA L., ADVOCATE) AND: THE CHIEF MANAGER BANK OF BARODA, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9776 WP No. 27083 of 2025 NELAMANGALA MAIN BRANCH 1242, DWARAKA PLAZA, BH ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL-562123. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHITHRA NIRMALA P., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) QUASH THE E-AUCTION/SALE NOTICE DATED 08.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AS ILLEGAL AS THE SAME IS WITHOUT FOLLOWING MANDATORY PROVISIONS; B) CONSEQUENTLY, TO DECLARE THAT THE ACTION INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER THE EXERCISE OF THE BANKING POWERS/SARFASI ACT IS NULL AND VOID; C) PASS SUCH FURTHER OR OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THIS PARTICULAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ***** - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9776 WP No. 27083 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for both parties jointly submit that as the petitioner and her brother have now deposited some substantial portion of the outstanding amount, and the respondent-Bank has already released the car in question in favour of the petitioner, in view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition may be disposed of as having rendered infructuous. 2. Submission is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45