Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14491 (BOM)

KULDIP WALMIK KORE (KOLI) v. PRIYA KULDIP KORE (KOLI) AND OTHERS

APPLN/4978/2025 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4978.25appln (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4978 OF 2025 IN REVNST/13684/2025 KULDIP WALMIK KORE (KOLI) VERSUS PRIYA KULDIP KORE (KOLI) AND OTHERS ….. Mr A. S. Mirajgaonkar, Advocate h/f Mr A. S. Radikar, Advocate for Applicant ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 01st OCTOBER, 2026 P. C. : 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 184 days in filing criminal revision application. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicant has filed service affidavit before this Court pointing out that in pursuance of the order passed by this Court, he has served the respondents by private mode of service. The report states that the notice has returned to the sender with the remarks that it is unclaimed. 3. In view of aforesaid service affidavit, as the notice is not claimed by the respondents, service is complete. 2026:BHC-AUG:46348 4978.25appln (2) 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay is condoned. This Criminal Application is disposed of. 5. Criminal Revision Application be registered. 6. In order to give one chance to respondents, list the criminal revision application on 15/10/2026. If no one appears for respondents on the next date of hearing, this Court shall proceed with the matter in accordance with law. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk