THASEEN SULTANA v. M/S PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
WP/15852/2024 · 2026-03-06
Sachin Shankar Magadum
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14489 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14489 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13926 WP No. 15852 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 15852 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
THASEEN SULTANA D/O MOHAMMED SHAFIULLA AGE 44 YEARS R/O H. NO.01, GROUND FLOOR 8/3, PRIZM AZAILEA, HARRIS ROAD BENSON TOWN, BENGALORE KARNATAKA- 560046 AND ALSO AT H. NO.6 AHMED SAIT ROAD FRAZER TOWN, BENGALORE-560005.
2.
DR. MOHAMED TAMEEMULLAH S/O MOHAMMED SHAFIULLA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O H. NO.01, GROUND FLOOR 8/3, PRIZM AZAILEA, HARRIS ROAD BENSON TOWN, BENGALORE KARNATAKA- 560046. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHAIKH SAOUD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M/S PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT UNIT NO.601, 6TH FLOOR PIRAMAL AMITI BUILDING AGASTYA CORPORATE PARK
Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13926 WP No. 15852 of 2024
KAMANI JUNCTION, OPP. FIRE STATION L.B.S. MARG, KURLA (W) MUMBAI - 400070. …RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC.438 OF Cr.PC, PRAYING THAT THE EXPARTE AWARD DATED 11-08-2023 PASSED BY THE SOLE ARBITRATOR AJAY YADAV (ADVOCATE), CHAMBER NO.75, NEAR GATE NO.1, SAHEED SUKDEV SINGH BLOCK, GURUGRAM DISTRICT COURT, HARYANA-122102, IN NO.ARB/PCHFL/6/2023/33 AT ANNEXURE-A, MAY PLEASED BE QUASHED AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
The award passed by the Arbitrator at Haryana is challenged by filing a writ petition before this Court. Office has raised an objection in regard to the maintainability of the writ petition.
2. Office objection is upheld and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
ALB, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 55