1 2026:CGHC:525-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3877 of 2025 1. Smt. Manisha Sahu @ Pinky W/o Rajeshwar Sahu, Aged About 30 Years R/o Dau Choura Khairagarh Dewangan Mohalla P.S. - Khairagarh Hall Baikunth Dham Camp-2 Near Murkatta School Police Station Chhawani District Durg (C.G.) Mo. No. 7880046718. 2. Manish Kumar Sahu S/o Vishnu Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Baikunth Dham Camp-2 Murkatta Near School Police Station Chhawani District - Durg (C.G.), Mo. No. 9691167022 3. Mukesh Sahu S/o Vishnu Sahu, Aged About 31 Years R/o Baikunth Dham Camp-2 Near Murkutta School Police Station Chhawani District Durg (C.G.), Mo. No. 7415044109, 8982380197. 4. Vishnu Sahu S/o Late Sampat Sahu, Aged About 57 Years R/o Baikunth Dham Camp-2 Near Murkutta School Police Station Chhawani District Durg (C.G.), Mo. No. 7880046718. 5. Smt. Sharada Sahu W/o Vishnu Sahu, Aged About 50 Years R/o Baikunth Dham Camp-2 Near Murkutta School Police Station Chhawani District Durg (C.G.), Mo. No. 7880046718. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent Of Police P.S. Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. Station House Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.01.06 17:33:19 +0530 2 3. Rajeshwar @ Raja Sahu S/o Bhajan Das Sahu, Aged About 33 Years R/o Lakoli Ward No. 36. Near Sadguru Medical Police Station Kotwali, District-Rajnandgaon, (C.G.), Mo. No. 8319982543 ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 06.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. T.K. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 and 2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the FIR No. 0045 of 2025, along with taking cognizance dated 30.10.2025 and criminal case No. 8676 of 2025, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajnandgaon against the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3 3. Upon perusal of the prayer clause in the present petition, it appears that the petition has been drafted with a defective prayer. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain the petition in its present form, as the prayer is vague and sketchy and does not disclose the offences for which the impugned FIR has been registered or the charge-sheet filed before the competent Court. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition containing an appropriate and complete prayer. 4. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the same. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- as costs before the Registry of this Court. The receipt of such deposit shall be submitted at the time of filing the fresh petition, if any. The amount so deposited shall be transmitted to the Government Disabled College, Mana Camp, Raipur (C.G.). 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioners after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan