Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14487 (JHR)

PRAKASH PRASAD MEHTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/6/2025 · 2026-02-04

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2981 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 6 of 2025 ---------- 1. Prakash Prasad Mehta, aged about 41 years, son of late Lato Mahto, resident of village Dariya, P.O. Ratanpur, P.S. Ichak, District Hazaribagh. 2. Ainul Ansari, aged about 52 years, son of late Haji Md. Zahur, resident of village Marhetta, P.O. Chandwar, P.S. Muffasil, District Hazaribagh. ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand; 2. Lalbiaktluanga Khiangte, Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. Chandra Shekhar Prasad, Principal Secretary, Revenue & Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District- Ranchi. 4. Bhore Singh Yadav, Director, Land Records & Survey Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi. 5. Nancy Sahay, Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O. & PS. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. 6. Indu Gupta, Settlement Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O. & PS.-Hazaribagh. District- Hazaribagh. 7. Indu Gupta, Charge Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O. & PS.. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. ………. Proforma Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Kumar Pawan, AC to SC(M)-III ---------- 06/ 04.02.2026 In view of the supplementary show-cause filed by the opposite party No. 3, no contempt is made out. 2. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. 3. However, the opposite parties are directed to expedite the matter for ultimate compliance. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 4th February, 2026 Kunal/- Uploaded on 11 / 02 / 2026