Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14487 (GAU)

AMLAN JYOTI BHUYAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/947/2026 · 2026-09-13

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010200302026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/947/2026 AMLAN JYOTI BHUYAN S/O SRI HIRANYA KUMAR BHUYAN, R/O SWASTIK CITY, FLAT 1A, BHAGADUTTAPUR, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI - 781019, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:UGRESH KUMAR GENERAL MANAGER ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK HEAD OFFICE ADAMS PLAZA G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A GANGULY, MR. DHANANJAY TALUKDAR,MR. TAPOBRAT CHHETRI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. A DHANUKA,MR. A GANGULY Linked Case : Crl.Pet./210/2024 AMLAN JYOTI BHUYAN S/O SRI HIRANYA KUMAR BHUYAN R/O SWASTIK CITY FLAT 1A BHAGADUTTAPUR KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019 Page No.# 2/3 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP ASSAM 2:UGRESH KUMAR GENERAL MANAGER ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK HEAD OFFICE ADAMS PLAZA G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. S K JAIN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 14.09.2026 Heard Mr. A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State respondent. Also heard the learned counsel for the informant. 2. This application has been filed seeking correction of the order dated 09.09.2026, passed in the connected Criminal Petition No. 210/2024. Page No.# 3/3 3. In the last pargraph of the said order, it has been reflected that the amount has been returned by the petitioner whereas the amount i.e. the borrowed money has been returned by the borrowers to the bank and accordingly correction is sought. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the aforesaid last pargraph of the order dated 09.09.2026 stands corrected and the same shall read as follows:- “As regards the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the amount i.e. the borrowed money has been returned by the borrowers, the learned counsel for the informant shall obtain instructions.” 5. This order shall form a part of the order dated 09.04.2026, passed in Criminal Petition 210/ 2024. 6. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant