Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010129762026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1397/2026 SMT GURPREET KOUR WIFE OF SRI SATVINDER SINGH, RESIDENT OF DEREAMVILL PLAZA, DEHIRAM BARMAN PATH, SURVEY, BELTOLA, P.O. BELTOLA, P.S. BASISHTHA, DISTRICT KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MR K J SAIKIA,MS M NIROLA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 16.09.2026 Heard Mr. A. K. Gupta, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. J. Baruah, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. By this application the petitioner has prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Latasil Police Station Case No.30/2024, corresponding to G.R. Page No.# 2/3 Case No. 1611/2024, registered under Sections 120B, 420, 465, 467, 468 of the IPC. 3. The FIR in connection with which, the petitioner is apprehending arrest was lodged by one, Smt. Chanda Basfor on 20.03.2024, stating inter alia that she was introduced to one, Manoj Basfor, who was a railway employee and that, Manoj Basfor promised her to obtain a loan on her behalf and that documents were given by the informant to said Manoj Basfor. She thereafter, stated that said Manoj Basfor had got a loan sanction to the tune of Rs. 1, 20,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Thousand) from various SBI branches and that, she received only Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand). She therefore, submits that said Manoj Basfor along with some bank officials are involved in financial scam. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was the branch manager of the concern SBI Branch and that, she had although put her signature in the said loan documents but she is not involved in the said scam. 5. Mr. R. J. Baruah, the learned APP for State, on perusal of the Case Diary submits that the petitioner is one of the signatory to sanctioning of the loan but it has also been detected by the Investigating Officer that the person who has applied for loan had given fake documents. 6. On considerations of the submissions made by the learned counsels, it is seen that, no specific allegations has been made against the petitioner. It is further noticed that the petitioner was enlarged on pre-arrest bail by order dated 24.06.2026, on the condition that she should appear before the Investigating Officer within a period of 1 (One) week and Mr. R. J. Baruah, Page No.# 3/3 learned APP, submits that, the petitioner has appeared before the I.O. and her statement was recorded. 7. It is, therefore, seen that the petitioner is co-operating with the investigation. Accordingly, the order dated 24.06.2026 is hereby made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall continue to abide by the directions and conditions stipulated in the said order dated 24.06.2026. 8. The AB Applications stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant