Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14482 (CAL)

M/S MOHINI CONSTRUCTION AND ANR v. EMPLOYEES P.F. ORG. ,DK BLOCK SECTOR II,SALT LAKE CITY AND ORS

WPA/28821/2022 · 2026-01-02

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.01.2026 Ct. No. 30 S.L. No. 27 SM WPA 28821 of 2022 With IA No: CAN 1 of 2023 CAN 2 of 2023 M/S. Mohini Construction & Anr. Versus Employees’ Provident Fund Organization & Ors. Ms. Moumita Roy …….for the petitioners Mrs. Sarda Sha ……for the Union of India Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed a written instruction wherein it appears that the petitioners herein are not willing to proceed with the writ application as per the decision of all the partners of the petitioners’ company. Let the written instruction be kept with the record. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of as withdrawn. CAN 1 of 2023 and CAN 2 of 2023 are also accordingly disposed of. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand disposed of consequently. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities. [Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]