Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14481 (AP)

Vadde Parvathi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/562/2026 · 2026-01-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010009102026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 562/2026 Between: 1. VADDE PARVATHI, C/O.CHELLAUBOINA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, EMPLOYED AND RESIDING AT QATAR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.16-32-6/2, MADDIPATI VARI STREET, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. VADDE PRASANNA KUMARI, D/O.VADDE PARVATHI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/O.16-32-6/2, MADDIPATIVARI STREET, UNDRAJAVARAM BYPAS ROAD, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533101. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAJANAGARAM POLICE STATION, RAJANAGARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533294. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondents Particularly the action of the respondent in summoning, threatening, and treating the Petitioners as accused merely on the basis of alleged financial transactions as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere into the life and liberty of the petitioners without following due process of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VM CHIRANJEEVI KOLLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents Particularly the action of the respondent No.4 in summoning, threatening, and treating the Petitioners as accused merely on the basis of alleged financial transactions as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the Respondents not to interfere in the life and liberty of the petitioners without following due process of law and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Petitioners herein are women and Petitioner No.2 is a pregnant lady, Petitioner No.1 is her mother. Further, without there being any case registered against the Petitioners, respondent Police are calling them to the Police Station. Further, Petitioner No.2 is a pregnant lady and her expected date of delivery is given on or before 12.01.2026. Learned counsel requested for a direction to respondent Police not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station since they are not arrayed as accused in any crime. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that the son of the Petitioner No.1 involved in a attempt to murder case and a case in Crime No.2 of 2026 is registered against him by Rajanagaram Police Station, East Godavari District. Since a case is registered against the son of the Petitioner 3 No.1, respondent Police made enquiries about his whereabouts. Respondent Police did not call the Petitioners to the Police Station. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Respondent Police are directed not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station since they are not arrayed as accused in any case. However, it does not preclude the respondent Police to make their efforts to trace out the accused in Crime No.2 of 2026 of Rajanagaram Police Station, East Godavari District, by following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 06.01.2026 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 562 of 2026 06.01.2026 Mjl /*