Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13583-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9449/2024
1. Ram Singh S/o Shri Ramnath, Aged About 62 Years, R/o 141, Bhanawali Srimadhopur District Neem Ka Thana Rajasthan
2. Babulal Bijarnia S/o Shri Mangal Chand, Aged About 37 Years, Muchh Marod Krishi Farm, Ward No. 4, Ringus Road, Shrimadhopur District Neem Ka Thana Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur.
3. The Director, Directorate Of Local Bodies, Near Residency, Civil Lines, C-Scheme, Jaipur
4. District Collector, Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana Rajasthan
5. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Shrimadhopur District Neem Ka Thana
6. Tehsildar, Shrimadhopur District Neem Ka Thana
7. Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Shrimadhopur District Neem Ka Thana
8. Superintendent Of Police, Neem Ka Thana Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma (Malpura), Mr. Shivang Singh Patel, Ms. Madhavi Vyas & Mr. Jeetram Choudhary. For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG, with Ms. Shikha Sharma. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, with Mr. Vishal Kumar. Mr. Kapil Bardhar, with Mr. Prerak Swami, Mr. Suresh Bairwa & Ms. Anshulika Pareek.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
[2026:RJ-JP:13583-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-9449/2024] O R D E R 01/04/2026
1. At the outset, Mr. G.S. Gill, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Ms. Shikha Sharma, representing the respondents-State submits that as per the instructions received and in terms of the status reports dated 09.12.2024, 15.01.2025 & 17.05.2025 filed by the concerned State authorities, most of the encroachments have already been removed. 1.1 He further assures the Court that in the event any encroachment remains, the same shall also be removed.
2. In light of such assurance given by learned Additional Advocate General, the present writ petition (PIL) is disposed of. The said assurance given by learned Additional Advocate General that most of the encroachments have already been removed is accepted. In case, any cause of action remains, it shall be open for the petitioners to make a representation to the competent authorities and approach this Court again, if needed. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 2 -Zeeshan/Tushar