Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1448 (JHR)

MUNNA ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1141/2026 · 2026-03-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:6006] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1141 of 2026 ------ Munna Ansari, aged about 53 Years, Son of Md. Nasim Ansari, Resident of Village- Ajemeri Tola (Nayatola), Harindanga Bazar, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station- Pakur (T), District- Pakur, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Nitu Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 09-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Pakur (T) P.S. Case No.330 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 303 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of jewelry from the house of the informant after breaking open the lock of his house. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It is further submitted that the articles which are said to be have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner do not tally from the stolen articles described in the F.I.R. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.12.2025 as has been mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No.330 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 09.03.2026-Animesh/