DADASAHEB PANDURANG BORADE v. VITTHAL BHANUDAS UDAWANT
CA/11365/2026 · 2026-09-30
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14472 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14472 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
960 CA NO. 11365 OF 2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 960 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11365 OF 2026 IN SAST/30475/2026 Dadasaheb Pandurang Borade VERSUS Vitthal Bhanudas Udawant ... Ms. Shraddha Sanap h/f Mr. Shirasath Suhas Rajendra, Advocate for Applicant ….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 30.09.2026 PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 106 days caused in filing the Second Appeal.
3. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. However, the same is subject to removal of office objections in the Second Appeal within a period of two weeks from today. Hence, the following order: ::ORDER:: a. The delay of 106 days caused in filing the Second Appeal is condoned subject to removal of office 1 of 2
(( 2 )) 960 CA NO. 11365 OF 2026 objections in the Second Appeal within a period of two weeks from today. In the event of failure to remove the office objections within the stipulated period, the application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Court.
SECOND APPEAL
1. Heard.
2. Subject to removal of the office objections within the stipulated period, issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on
25.11.2026.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2