[2026:RJ-JP:13468] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11129/2025 Mukesh Saran S/o Shri Madangopal, Age 25 Years, R/o Chhila, Police Station Shri Balaji, District Nagaur. (Accused In Present Confined Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12556/2025 Jagdish Saran S/o Shri Madangopal, Age 32 Years, R/o Village Chhila, P.s. Shri Balaji, Distt. Nagaur (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhav Mitra, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Veerendra Singh Mr. Sudhir Jain Mr. Prince Pal Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/04/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 43/2024 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG, Jaipur for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 of the Rajasthan Public [2026:RJ-JP:13468] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11129/2025] examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further contended that accused-petitioners are in custody since 01.08.2025 and 16.06.2025 respectively and charge-sheets have already been submitted on 14.10.2025. It is also contended that there are no criminal antecedents against petitioner Mukesh Saran. It is also argued that the charge-sheet itself is voluminous and trial of the case may take considerable time and after filing of the charge-sheet no witnesses have been examined till date, therefore considering the aforesaid fact, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that both the petitioners used malpractice in the PTI examination conducted by RSSMBS in the year 2022. The accused-petitioner Mukesh Saran is the main beneficiary and in place of him dummy candidate appeared in the examination. Petitioner Mukesh Saran served on the post of PTI for almost two years and accused petitioner Jagdish Saran assisted petitioner Mukesh Saran in the alleged offence, therefore, considering the gravity of the offence, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners deserve to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that petitioners remained in custody for long and after submission of the charge-sheet trial has yet not been proceeded, therefore this court without commenting [2026:RJ-JP:13468] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11129/2025] anything on the merits of the case deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Mukesh Saran S/o Shri Madangopal, and 2. Jagdish Saran S/o Shri Madangopal, in connection with FIR No. 43/2024 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG, Jaipur shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner Jagdish Saran S/o Shri Madangopal, is directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within seven days of release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same [2026:RJ-JP:13468] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11129/2025] before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /6-7