Tauseef 1 of 6 930-fa.3337.2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3338 OF 2017 SUDHAKAR TULSHIRAM PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS ... Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Manjusha S. Jagtap-Ware, Advocate for Acquiring body. ... AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3337 OF 2017 LAXMAN TOTARAM PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Manjusha S. Jagtap-Ware, Advocate for Acquiring body. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3335 OF 2017 SHENFADU NATTHU CHAUDHARI VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Kavita S. Bhale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3336 OF 2017 TULSHIRAM SAKHARAM PATIL VERSUS 2026:BHC-AUG:45129 Tauseef 2 of 6 930-fa.3337.2017 THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Kavita S. Bhale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3339 OF 2017 EKNATH TRAMBAK PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Manjusha S. Jagtap-Ware, Advocate for Acquiring body. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3332 OF 2017 BHIKA BAPU PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Kavita S. Bhale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3333 OF 2017 SUBHASH PANDHARINATH PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Kavita S. Bhale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Tauseef 3 of 6 930-fa.3337.2017 AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3344 OF 2017 PURSHOTTAM PANDHARINATH PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Kavita S. Bhale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3340 OF 2017 DILIP TULSHIRAM PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Manjusha S. Jagtap-Ware, Advocate for Acquiring body. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3341 OF 2017 PRALHAD TRAMBAK PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Manjusha S. Jagtap-Ware, Advocate for Acquiring body. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 3334 OF 2017 NARAYAN KAUTIK PATIL AND ORS VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.T.P.H-3, JALGAON AND ORS … Tauseef 4 of 6 930-fa.3337.2017 Mr. Ajeet B. Kale a/w. Mr. Balasaheb Pawar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent-State. Ms. Manjusha S. Jagtap-Ware, Advocate for Acquiring body. … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 2003, the appeal is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. By the present appeals, the Appellants/Claimants are aggrieved by the judgments and awards dated 03.05.2017 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalgaon in LAR Nos.969/2007, 970/2007, 968/2007, 971/2007, 973/2007, 974/2007, 975/2007, 972/2007, 963/2007, 962/2007, 966/2007, 964/2007, 967/2007 and 965/2007, whereby the learned Reference Court refused to enhance the compensation to the extent of amount claimed by the Claimants. 3. All the Advocates appearing in these matter have submitted that the present appeals can be disposed of in view of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in First Appeal No.813 of 2023 and the batch of the other appeals, whereby the lands from the village Wadgaon, Pimpalgaon, Kamani, Sonala, Hivarkheda, Digar, Kasabe, Sheri and Paldhi. The present appeals arising out of the project of M. I, Tauseef 5 of 6 930-fa.3337.2017 Tank, Sonala, Taluka Jamner, District Jalgaon. 4. Therefore, they are from the same project, Coordinate Bench of this Court in First Appeal No.813 of 2023 with connected matters have already taken a view, as from the different villages, the lands were acquired. 5. Learned Advocate for the Appellants/Claimants submits that this Court has taken a view in First Appeal No.813 of 2023 with connected matters decided on 07.11.2025 arising out of same acquisition proceeding. 6. Upon perusal of order passed by this Court in First Appeal No.813 of 2023 with connected matters, I am inclined to adopt the same view in the present appeals. Therefore, present appeals are disposed of accordingly. In view of the order passed by this Court in First Appeal No.813 of 2023, I proceed to pass the following order:- O R D E R A. First appeals are partly allowed. B. Appellants–Claimants be paid following compensation. I. For irrigated land @ 12,00,000/- per hectare. II. For Jirayat land @ Rs. 6,00,000/- per hectare. III. For Pot Kharab @ Rs. 3,00,000/- per hectare. IV. Value of fruit bearing trees @ 80% of the valuation report submitted in the Reference Court. Tauseef 6 of 6 930-fa.3337.2017 C. Appellants/Claimants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits including interest from the date of award as per law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailash Shiva Rangari, reported in 2016(3) Mh.L.J. 457. D. It would be open for them to claim rental compensation as permissible in law and in view of the prevailing government policy. E. Chart submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants shall be treated as part of record and award. F. Modified award be drawn accordingly. G. Rest of the award is maintained. H. Pending civil applications, if any, are also disposed of. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)