C.GANGI REDDY, HYD v. S.M.V. PRASAD, CHITTOOR DIST. & ANOTHER
CC/1205/2017 · 2026-01-26
Battu Devanand, Kiranmayee Mandava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14462 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14462 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010009252017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3568] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1205/2017 Between:
1. C.GANGI REDDY, HYD, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY. AGED 62 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 2-2-25/7/P/7/1, DURGABAI DESHMUKH COLONY, BAGH AMBERPET. HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER AND
1. S M V PRASAD CHITTOOR DIST ANOTHER, S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGE NOT KNOWN, DISTRICT REGISTRAR, SRI BALAJI REGISTRATION DISTRICT. TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
2. S VIJAY KUMAR REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGE NOT KNOWN, SUB REGISTRAR, RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be to pleased to punish the respondents for contempt of court for willful disobedience of violating the orders of the Hon'ble Court dated 29-01-2016 in W.P.No.25833 of 2014, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(APPL 3974 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
2
condone the delay of (10) days in representing the above case in CC(SR) No.3303 of 2017 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. G L NAGESWAR RAO
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1205 of 2017
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining wilfull disobedience of the order, dated 29.01.2016 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.25833 of 2014.
2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that as per the order, dated 29.01.2016, the petitioner made representation on 16.04.2016 for registration of the documents. Thereafter, the documents were registered as pending Document No.402 of 2016. In view of the same, learned counsel contends that the order of this Court is complied with and sought to close the Contempt Case.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents and submits that the order of this Court is complied with.
4. In view of the submissions made by the respective counsels recorded herein above, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt Case.
4
5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
6. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Dated: 27.01.2026 TM
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1205/2017
Dated: 27.01.2026 TM