HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35550 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.68 out of 186) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jawad Tariq, learned counsel for the informant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.373 of 2026, Under Section 74, 126(2), 115(2), 351(2) B.N.S. and Section 7/8, 9M(L) / 10 POCSO Act, Police Station- Tundla, District- Firozabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the place of the incident is opposite the bank, but no CCTV footage was obtained by the Investigating Officer. The informant herein is a police constable and is hell-bent on keeping the applicant behind bars. Earlier also, an FIR of outraging the modesty was instituted against the applicant, in which the applicant was enlarged on bail, and subsequently, the instant case has been foisted on the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history and has been in jail since 07.08.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that there are two victims in the instant case and both are of tender age, i.e., 11 years and 13 years old; as such, the applicant is not entitled to bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Noor Muhammad, Yogesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jawad Tariq Sachin Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Sachin Yadav, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 6, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 35550 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad