Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14457 (BOM)

FULCHAND LAXMAN SALAMPURE SINCE DIED THR HIS LEGAL REPR. SUMANBAI AND ORS. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ANR.

CA/11451/2026 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 935 CA 11451 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11451 OF 2026 IN FA/95/2022 FULCHAND LAXMAN SALAMPURE SINCE DIED THR HIS LEGAL REPR. SUMANBAI AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ANR. ... Mr. S. S. Patunkar h/f. J. P. Legal Associates, Advocate for Applicants Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State Mr. Atul B. Kuber h/f. Mr. S. V. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.2 … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 1st October 2026 P.C. :- . This Civil Application is filed for recalling of order dated 30.07.2026 passed in Civil Application No. 8089 of 2026 and amending prayer clause “B” of the said application. 2. Mr. S. S. Patunkar, learned Advocate for the applicants submits that although the application was filed for withdrawal of the amount by applicant Nos.1A to 1E, mistakenly, in prayer clause “B”, it was mentioned as applicant Nos.1A to 1G. He further submits that the said application came to be allowed in terms of the details given by the applicants in prayer clause “B”. Now, his genuine difficulty is that due to 2026:BHC-AUG:46341 2 935 CA 11451 OF 2026 this typographical error, he is unable to withdraw the amount. Hence, this application is filed for recalling of the order dated 30.07.2026 passed by this Court in Civil Application No.8089 of 2026 and for leave to correct the typographical error in the said application. 3. Mr. Atul B. Kuber h/f. Mr. S. V. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for the acquiring body fairly submits that he has no objection to pass appropriate order. 4. I have seen the prayer clause “B” of the said application which is part of the present Civil Application, being incorrect. In view of this, the applicants are permitted to cure prayer clause “B” of Civil Application No.8089 of 2026. Correction be carried out forthwith. 5. In view of this, Civil Application is allowed. The order dated 30.07.2026 passed in Civil Application No.8089 of 2026 is recalled and corrected by replacing the words “applicant Nos.1A to 1G” by the words “Nos.1A to 1E” in prayer clause “B” of the operative order. 6. Civil Application stands disposed of. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) PRW