Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14455 (JHR)

SAFAUL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1915/2026 · 2026-03-13

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6767 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1915 of 2026 --------- Safaul Ansari, son of late Samsuddin Miyan, aged about 22 years, resident of village Raghunathpur, P.O. Madhupur, P.S. Khaga, Dist. Deoghar, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyanshu Shubham, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. --------- 02/ 13.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the I.T. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that there is no specific overt act attributed against the petitioner. He further submits that the co-accused namely, Izhar Alam has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.03.2026, passed in B.A. No. 1541 of 2026. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.12.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned Spl.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation against the petitioner coupled with the fact that co-accused has been granted bail; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2026:JHHC:6767 2 Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 170 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 13th March, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 16.03.2026