SRI SARAYU INFRA STRUCTURES AND DEVELOPERS v. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL
CC/110/2025 · 2026-02-05
B Krishna Mohan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14451 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14451 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010007372025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 110/2025 Between:
1. SRI SARAYU INFRA STRUCTURES AND DEVELOPERS, REP.BY.ITS. PROPRIETOR, SRI LMOHAN KRISHNA REDDY S/O.BHASKAR RAMA REDDY, AGE 40 YEARS, R/O. 27-11272/9,MC RESIDENCY,BAIAJI NAGAR, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. SRI.SHAI ALTHAF BHSHA, S/O.HUMAYUN, D.NO.24/84,ROTTELA STREET,RAMAIAH SCHOOL,
MULAPET, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBUN DEVELOPMENT , SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPNDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.
2. SRI SK RAHAMTHU JANI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. SRI M SURYA TEJA, REP.BY .COMMISSIONER,MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.
2
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 21.10.2024 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No. 19150/2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A S C BOSE
2. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA
3. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
3
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Contempt Case, for which, he filed a Court slip.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
06.02.2026 SCH
4
379
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
C.C.No.110 of 2025
Date: 06.02.2026
SCH