HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8840 of 2019 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Present petition has been listed under the heading "Cases Likely to be Infructuous". Office report dated 6.10.206 indicates that the proceedings before the trial Court out of which present petition has arisen, have been concluded, and in view thereof, the petition has become infructuous. Sri Vidya Kant Shukla, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents submits that as per the stand of the State respondents, the premises in question has been vacated by the office of the respondent no.3, and the possession thereof, has been handed over to the petitioner. It is submitted that no cause-of-action survives in the present petition. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. It is, however, observed that in the event any cause of action still survives, it shall be open to the party concerned to move an appropriate application seeking recall of this order. October 6, 2026 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archit Mandhyan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Veer Singh .....Petitioner(s) Additional District Judge Court No 10 Meerut And 03 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad