APHC010007552026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1203/2026 Between: Kore Kasi Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SRILATHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue an appropriate order writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent Station House Officer Cumbum Police Station in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent in respect of the subject property an extent of Ac.0.25 ¼ cents in Sy.No.344-2B2 situated at Kagithalagudem Village, Hajarathgudem Gram Panchayat, Cumbum Mandal, as illegal arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct 2 the respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession enjoyment and right to alienate the subject property except in accordance with due process of law and pass such other order(s)…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Sri Y. Rajesh, learned counsel representing Sri P. Srilatha Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the police/respondent No.3 have been calling the petitioner to the police station and interfering in a civil dispute. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that the 4th respondent submitted a complaint before the 3rd respondent, which was entered in the General Diary. He further submits that a preliminary enquiry was conducted under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), and it was observed that a civil dispute is pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. Thereafter, the petitioner was never called to the police station. 5. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 27.01.2026 KMS 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.1203 of 2026 Date: 27.01.2026 KMS 206