Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14448 (AP)

VELISETTY VENKATESWARLU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1013/2026 · 2026-01-07

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010009042026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 1013/2026 Between: 1. VELISETTY VENKATESWARLU, S/O NARASAIAH,AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, BUSINESS, RIO 15-173, NEAR SIVALAYAM, PODILI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 523240 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, - SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTURDISTRICT 522503 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 523155 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KORISAPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 523212 4. MUMMANA NARASIMHA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, DAIVLARAVUR VILLAGE, KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 523212 5. MUMMANA KAMALAMMA, W/O SAMBHASIVA RAO, 2 DAIVLARAVUR VILLAGE, KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 523212 6. MUMMANA VENKAMMA, W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH, DAIVLARAVUR VILLAGE, KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 523212 7. MUMMANA ANJ AMMA ANJ ANI DEVI, W/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, DAIVLARAVUR VILLAGE, KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 523212 8. GANTA SUNIL BABU, S/O SESHAGIRI RAO, KOLASANAKOTA VILLAGE, MADDDIJ2ADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 523211 9. GANTA ASLESHA, W/O PRASANTH, KOLASANAKOTA VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 523211 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.1013 of 2026 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the orders dated 08.12.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 3. As against the orders dated 08.12.2025, the statute provide an alternative remedy under Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. In view of the said provision, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file a revision before the competent authority within a period of one (1) month from the date of receipt of copy of this order and along with the revision, the petitioner may also file an interlocutory application. If any such application is filed, the revisional authority may initially consider the same after notice to the affected parties and pass appropriate orders. Till such 4 time, the respondent authorities are directed not to effect the orders dated 08.12.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 08.01.2026 Ivd 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.1013 of 2026 Dated: 08.01.2026 Ivd