PAPPI DEVI @ PAPITA W/O LATE CHUTTANLAL MEENA v. DEVENDRA SINGH GURJAR S/O SAMAYSINGH GURJAR
CRES/762/2024 · 2026-09-01
Anuroop Singhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:35308] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 762/2024 In S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.6215/2017 CNR: RJHC020572382024 | URN: CRES / 1022U / 2024
1. Pappi Devi @ Papita W/o Late Chuttanlal Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil- Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
2. Sonu S/o Late Chuttanlal, Aged About 17 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Pappi Devi, R/o Village- Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3. Kumari Khushboo D/o Late Chuttanlal, Aged About 14 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Pappi Devi, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
4. Mooli Devi, W/o Ramkishan Meena, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
5. Ramkishan S/o Late Ramchandra Meena, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Village-Diwanchali Khurd, Tehsil-Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Devendra Singh Gurjar S/o Samaysingh Gurjar, R/o Village-Purodaheli, Post-Kema Kemri, Tehsil-Nadoti, District-Karoli, Rajasthan.(Driver/owner).
2. New India Assurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, Branch, Dausa.(Insurance Company). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramdeo Arya for Mr. Ritesh Jain For Respondent(s) :
[2026:RJ-JP:35308] (2 of 2) [CRES-762/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 01/09/2026
1. The matter comes up on application No.1520/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay in filing of the present restoration application.
2. Considering the submissions made and reasons mentioned in the delay condonation application, the same is allowed and consequently, delay in filing the present restoration application is condoned.
3. The present restoration application has been filed on account of non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.02.2024 resulting into passing of the consequential order dated
20.04.2024.
4. Considering the submission made and for the reasons mentioned in the present restoration application, the present restoration application is allowed and as a consequence thereto, S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.6215/2017 is restored to its original number.
5. Office to proceed accordingly.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J 35/DIPESH CHAYAL