Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14446 (ALL)

JAGANNATH AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIB/3364/2026 · 2026-10-05

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3364 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Shri Vinay Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel has accepted notices on behalf of Caveator. The present Writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 16.06.2026 passed by the respondent no. 2, Additional District Magistrate (Judicial)/ Deputy Director of Consolidation, Chitrakoot, in Case No. 0253 of 2025 (202554071900000253) Ram Rup and others vs. Nanka, under Section 48 (1) of U.P.C.H. Act. Learned Standing Counsel at the very outset submits that for the relief claimed in the present writ petition the petitioner has effective and alternative remedy of initiating proceedings under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. October 6, 2026 Deepak/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Yadav (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Jagannath And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad